That does not sound too promising. Hope for the best.Oats said we could have an update this afternoon. Bruner and Herb are both in Birmingham being evaluated this morning.
*refreshes twitterThose around the team are staying tight lipped until Oats announces… but expect some relatively good news for both, especially on the Herb front.
Those around the team are staying tight lipped until Oats announces… but expect some relatively good news for both, especially on the Herb front.
Depends on the stage of the tear. I suspect, though not 100% sure, playing with a torn meniscus may be the path to completing this season.Torn meniscus require surgery?
Would not say losing Bruner for 10-12 games is “ dodging a bullet”. Pretty brutal loss considering how he has been playing. May alter the season greatly.Awesome news. Eli H is usually very credible. Holding my breath until it's official, but it seems that we dodged some major bullets.
Would not say losing Bruner for 10-12 games is “ dodging a bullet”. Pretty brutal loss considering how he has been playing. May alter the season greatly.
Glad Herb will be back shortly.
Much better than torn ACL.Well to me, it is dodging a bullet. I certainly feared it was an ACL injury and he would be done for the year. So in my mind, to have him back in any capacity after what I saw last night, is dodging a bullet.
Would not say losing Bruner for 10-12 games is “ dodging a bullet”. Pretty brutal loss considering how he has been playing. May alter the season greatly.
Glad Herb will be back shortly.
Herb is a warrior. He proved that last year. I wouldn't be surprised at all to see him in the lineup Saturday.Update on Herb: initial timeline was a return next week. But he’s feeling good today and is going to try to give it a go on Saturday. Who knows how productive the minutes will be, but you’ve got to respect and appreciate the heart.
I agree if more rest allows him to fully heal I don’t want him to force it.We might not need him against Ark. give him more time to heal.
You guys may be underestimating Arkansas. They’re more than capable of beating us, even if we’re at full strength. I think it would be pretty difficult to beat them without Bruner and Herb, especially when you consider that JQ may be a little rusty after not having played the last 3 games (that’s assuming that he’ll be back Saturday).I agree if more rest allows him to fully heal I don’t want him to force it.
Reese has been playing great lately but give me Bruner over Reese every time man. Don’t get me wrong, Reese has made huge strides this year but he still makes mistakes that I don’t see Bruner make. I love Bruner’s leadership tooIn my opinion, if Alex Reese keeps playing this way he is more productive than Bruner. We need Bruner big time from a depth standpoint. Unfortunately his injury means more Rojas and Gary. If Herb’s finger was just dislocated I just don’t see that causing him to miss much. Personally wouldn’t be surprised to see him suited up Saturday.
I agree, that we will have a hard time beating Arkansas, even with a healthy Herb. Without Herb, it would be much tougher imop. I think the point they are trying to make, which I agree with, is that it is better to risk losing a few games now, than it is to bring back Herb too soon, which would endanger the entire season/post season.You guys may be underestimating Arkansas. They’re more than capable of beating us, even if we’re at full strength. I think it would be pretty difficult to beat them without Bruner and Herb, especially when you consider that JQ may be a little rusty after not having played the last 3 games (that’s assuming that he’ll be back Saturday).
Oh gun to my head I predict we pick up our first L Saturday afternoon. Not underestimating them at all... just saying I’ll take a loss or two and let Herb heal rather than rush him back and let him be gimpy all season.You guys may be underestimating Arkansas. They’re more than capable of beating us, even if we’re at full strength. I think it would be pretty difficult to beat them without Bruner and Herb, especially when you consider that JQ may be a little rusty after not having played the last 3 games (that’s assuming that he’ll be back Saturday).
Bruner is less than worthless on defense... I mean really, really bad. Man, I guess Petty is just in some people’s dog house and won’t get out. He is clearly, without question our second best defender. Ellis right behind him. I do agree Reese is not a good defender, but Bruner is brutal. He’s had some good help blocks, but one on one in the paint he gets chewed up every single time.So where exactly are the strides that have been made by Reese? Or the strong play outside of literally one game (last one vs Kentucky)? Let's take a look at his stats this year. 30.9% FG and 25% from 3 for a whopping 4.5 points per game... under 3 rebounds per game also. He turns the ball over almost every time he comes in the game. He doesn't get to the FT line (4 attempts this year). He's improved no doubt on the defensive end, but he's still incredibly soft for his size and cannot provide much when playing the 5 on defense. I just don't really see much of the positives that many on this board seem to allude to. Especially the comments that he is or could be just as productive as Bruner... that is about as far from the truth as is possible. Bruner is our second best defender behind Herb, maybe our best passer/best vision on the court, and provides an actual 3 point threat unlike Reese (32.4% on the season).
Reese has played much better of late. I guess we can look at the season stats, but he's brought a ton of energy lately. He hasn't been exposed on defense. Played much better on offense as a whole. I'd like to have Bruner too. But Bruner isn't our second best defender. Petty can flat out guard.So where exactly are the strides that have been made by Reese? Or the strong play outside of literally one game (last one vs Kentucky)? Let's take a look at his stats this year. 30.9% FG and 25% from 3 for a whopping 4.5 points per game... under 3 rebounds per game also. He turns the ball over almost every time he comes in the game. He doesn't get to the FT line (4 attempts this year). He's improved no doubt on the defensive end, but he's still incredibly soft for his size and cannot provide much when playing the 5 on defense. I just don't really see much of the positives that many on this board seem to allude to. Especially the comments that he is or could be just as productive as Bruner... that is about as far from the truth as is possible. Bruner is our second best defender behind Herb, maybe our best passer/best vision on the court, and provides an actual 3 point threat unlike Reese (32.4% on the season).
Bruner is less than worthless on defense... I mean really, really bad. Man, I guess Petty is just in some people’s dog house and won’t get out. He is clearly, without question our second best defender. Ellis right behind him. I do agree Reese is not a good defender, but Bruner is brutal. He’s had some good help blocks, but one on one in the paint he gets chewed up every single time.
Why do you have to put your tallest guy on Bruner?When in man to man you have to put your tallest guy on Bruner thus opening up the lane for our guards to drive. With Reese you can put your worst defender on him and worry about the other 4. Now the high screen game can allow for some mismatches on Petty but if you can guard Reese at 23 feet you are good. Even when you don't guard him he seldom makes you pay.
More likely bc he's the least likely to beat their big off the dribble, bc he doesn't post anyone. The tallest player thing isn't the biggest deal.You'd have to ask opposing coaches why they are putting their tallest player on Bruner. I guess because he is 6'10"??