What an incredible job he’s done with Alabama basketball.
For the more experienced fans, when was Alabama basketball this relevant?
For the more experienced fans, when was Alabama basketball this relevant?
What an incredible job he’s done with Alabama basketball.
For the more experienced fans, when was Alabama basketball this relevant?
Yep, Wimp had a lot of real dudes on his teams…too bad he thought basketball was supposed to be a rock fight and got wrecked by the 3pt line and open offenses.Not since Wimp Sanderson days and before that CM Newton.
This is a tough question. Last year was obviously the best season we’ve had in 30 years… and he’s got us right back this year with a sightly uglier but still getting it done type team. I’m 34 years old, and I’ve never had this much tangible reason for optimism. Even the Elite 2004 season wasn’t really a great season. It was really a struggle in the sec… they just went off in the tournament. That was a bubble team for much of the year.
Technically, Mark Gottfried’s Elite 8 team and No. 1 ranked team (for one week) was “relevant.” But, I would say Wimp’s last years were the best in the last 40 years.What an incredible job he’s done with Alabama basketball.
For the more experienced fans, when was Alabama basketball this relevant?
Absolutely right. Rebounding and ending their possessions by getting 50/50 balls was huge.Most trips to Florida have resulted in blowout losses. This team isn’t pretty but they will compete. I thought we were in a lot better shape than Florida. We got all the 50,50 balls in the 2nd half
What an incredible job he’s done with Alabama basketball.
For the more experienced fans, when was Alabama basketball this relevant?
Wimp had some really good teams in the mid 80’s, but his best teams, and the most talented that I have ever seen at Bama(since’83), we’re his teams from ‘87-‘92(excluding ‘88). The Elite 8 team in ‘04 just played well for the 1st 3 games of the tournament. The last really relevant contending team, outside of last season, was in ‘03 when were a #2 seed.Technically, Mark Gottfried’s Elite 8 team and No. 1 ranked team (for one week) was “relevant.” But, I would say Wimp’s last years were the best in the last 40 years.
This ^^^^Not since Wimp Sanderson days and before that CM Newton.
Ask me after the season.What an incredible job he’s done with Alabama basketball.
For the more experienced fans, when was Alabama basketball this relevant?
I can’t remember watching Alabama play a Florida team and the talent differential being so significant.What an incredible job he’s done with Alabama basketball.
For the more experienced fans, when was Alabama basketball this relevant?
Not under CNOMost trips to Florida have resulted in blowout losses. This team isn’t pretty but they will compete. I thought we were in a lot better shape than Florida. We got all the 50,50 balls in the 2nd half
Wimp and CM had some astonishingly talented teams. Take a look at some of their lineups.CM and Wimp had some very competitive teams, but I personally think Oats recruiting is stronger than either one of them. The system CNO runs helps his recruiting and the top players give Bama looks now we didn't get under previous coaches. Wimp is a friend of mine and I think he would agree (with a scowl on his face)
One of Newton’s teams had three NBA starters-Douglas,Mule King and TR Dunn. The other 2 starters Murray and Brown played in EuropeWimp and CM had some astonishingly talented teams. Take a look at some of their lineups.
JD shot 14% from 3pt and 50% from the FT stripe in EYBL as a prep, so I don’t expect him to be a plus shooter…if he can just become average then that would be a huge boost.If JD can find his outside shot, Bama is going to be a problem.
yes he isCoach showed a ton of respect to Wimp at the game where he weared the plaid sport coat. He respects tradition. I suspect Wimp is VERY pleased with the hire . . .
The sign of a well coached team is beating a 13.5 point underdog on the road. This is not a well coached team…they play as discombobulated as any team we have ever had. What is sad is we are more talented than the teams we lose to and that for sure is a sign of a poorly coached team and a team without good chemistry.What an incredible job he’s done with Alabama basketball.
For the more experienced fans, when was Alabama basketball this relevant?
I do agree at times it does seem the decisions being made are somewhat questionable, but I will say not sure we are more talented. Not a excuse for our bad play, but just feel we are always told how talented we are, but not sure this team is “that talented”. We have some talent, but only JQ, JD, Bediako, Shack and maybe Ellis not sure that this team is that overly talented. Even a couple of those guys might not be as talented as we all think.The sign of a well coached team is beating a 13.5 point underdog on the road. This is not a well coached team…they play as discombobulated as any team we have ever had. What is sad is we are more talented than the teams we lose to and that for sure is a sign of a poorly coached team and a team without good chemistry.
You are probably right…maybe my idea of this team is based on my overly enthusiastic hope of a well coached team. We are probably just a typical NIT caliber squad. Darn it I was hoping for better. Maybe our women’s basketball team will do well!!I do agree at times it does seem the decisions being made are somewhat questionable, but I will say not sure we are more talented. Not a excuse for our bad play, but just feel we are lays told how talented we are, but not sure this team is “that talented”. We have some talent, but last JQ, JD, Bediako, Shack and maybe Ellis not sure that this team is that overly talented. Even a couple of those guys might not be as talented as we all think.
I think Coach has done well and thats why we are where we are at. I think he’s done well with the talent we have and we will get better. I don’t think our talent is horrible, but just doesn’t match what we here from talking heads on tv. With that said I do such Coach would use timeouts better. Haha!You are probably right…maybe my idea of this team is based on my overly enthusiastic hope of a well coached team. We are probably just a typical NIT caliber squad. Darn it I was hoping for better. Maybe our women’s basketball team will do well!!
Were they poorly coached at Florida Tuesday night or when they beat Gonzaga in Seattle? I see a lack of effort on D too many times and that is on the players.The sign of a well coached team is beating a 13.5 point underdog on the road. This is not a well coached team…they play as discombobulated as any team we have ever had. What is sad is we are more talented than the teams we lose to and that for sure is a sign of a poorly coached team and a team without good chemistry.
We are more talented than Iona, Davidson, or Missouri. I don’t think anyone would dispute that.I do agree at times it does seem the decisions being made are somewhat questionable, but I will say not sure we are more talented. Not a excuse for our bad play, but just feel we are always told how talented we are, but not sure this team is “that talented”. We have some talent, but only JQ, JD, Bediako, Shack and maybe Ellis not sure that this team is that overly talented. Even a couple of those guys might not be as talented as we all think.
This team is a 5 seed in the tournament. I think you’re forgetting what our typical NIT teams actually look like.You are probably right…maybe my idea of this team is based on my overly enthusiastic hope of a well coached team. We are probably just a typical NIT caliber squad. Darn it I was hoping for better. Maybe our women’s basketball team will do well!!
We’re a borderline top 25 team. Most likely a 7-8 seed in the tournamentThis team is a 5 seed in the tournament. I think you’re forgetting what our typical NIT teams actually look like.
If we’re a fringe top 25 team we won’t be an 8 seed. Even so… point still stands.We’re a borderline top 25 team. Most likely a 7-8 seed in the tournament